adiere de vant

Si care ar fi mai interesanti? La Lord of the Rings ma pot uita la nesfarsit, pe cand la Harry Potter nu ma pot uita deloc. Nu umbla nimeni cu pompa, doar ca tu nu esti in stare sa faci nici o deosebire intre cele doua. Superficialule!))

parintii pot sa ceara sa se faca botezul prin stropire, nu prin scufundare. tot botez se cheama si nu e nici un risc:)

al meu este, peste tot..

macar atat:) da' unde-i d-zeul tau? poate te ajuta vrajitorul:)))

sa inteleg ca te-ai dus pentru mama. dar si pentru tine..sa fii tu mai impacat. ca preotii ca preotii, si eu stiu unul mai pacatos decat mine:) da' fiecare cu ale lui. asta e alta poveste. intr-o situatie descrisa mai sus, ce faci? cum reactionezi? inside and outside?

am si io o intrebare fiindca va tot invartiti in structuri. concret, daca/cand va moare cineva apropiat, o ruda sa zicem, cineva din familie, mergeti la biserica? la care o fi ea, crestina, budhista, etc.. ce faceti? cititi forumul in continuare ca si cum nu s-ar fi intamplat nimic?

si empatia ce rol are? o persoana care este agresiva nici macar nu realizeaza ca este agresiva, din cauza ego-ului puternic care ii conduce creierul. inima poate salva creierul, un barbatcu o heart e wise, pe cand un creier fara inima e useless.

hai sa zicem ca rationalul e creierul, iar irationalul e inima. inima poate intelege creierul, dar creierul nu, pentru ca-i capos:)un om fara EQ (inteligenta emotionala) si doar cu IQ e dominator si agresiv. daca nu exista o oarecare balantza intre cele doua componente nu ajungem nicaieri:)

religia, spiritualitatea e ca filozofia. o accepti sau nu o accepti. vrei sa dai bani pentru biserici, dai. nu vrei, nu dai. ortodoxismul e destul de flexibila. poti sa mergi din an in pasti sau deloc. esti liber. iar cum cumperi multe lucruri inutile (banuiesc:), poti da si zece lei la biserica:)

invataturi despre spirit, ideea de D-zeu, cu multi ani inainte de Christos, conform articolului de mai jos: "Seeradhwaja Janaka was a great scholar and an enlightened person. His life dates back to 5000 BC; he was the King of Mithila (the current Janakpur) and Shri Sita's father (Shri Ram's wife). It is interesting to note the composition of his city's name, Mith+Ila: ‘Mith’ derives from Mithya, that means illusory, and ‘Ila’ means Atman. The words together mean ‘Illusion of Atman’. The result is very interesting as helping people to win over their illusions and realize their atman is just the main task of the Guru. The Ashtavakra Samhita - teachings about nondualism The Ashtavakra Samhita is an Advaita Vedanta scripture that documents a dialogue between the master Ashtavakra and his disciple Raja Janaka. It shows the basics of the nondualism (Advaita) - “Nothing but the Spirit exists”, “The Sage is free from the pairs of opposites as it is a child” - that leads to the comprehension of the illusoriness of all the pairs of opposites - “I renounced to the good and the bad and I live happy” - and to the Self Realization - “Thinking to the Absolute you do nothing but using a form of thought. So, dropped this thought, I permanently dwell in my Self.” Realizing the Self, Ashtavakra emphasizes, does not mean becoming, but being the Self: “Having realizaed that the Self is in everything and that everything is in the Self, free from the sense of individuality and possessiveness, be happy”. A great knower of Atma - Atma Jnana One day, Raja Janaka sent a message to the people in his kingdom: “If there is a great Sage, whoever he may be, let him come and teach me the knowledge of Atma. If this person offering to teach me Atma Jnana is not able to accomplish this task of providing me an experience of instant illumination then I don't want to see him, even if he is the most learned person in the land”. All the Pundits and Rishis were a little frightened by this requirement, except for one: a young man called Ashtavakra. He went straight to the King and offered to solve the problem if the King satisfied two conditions: the first one was going to the forest, that is in a pure, sattva place; the second one was more delicate: «You must give me your mind» said Ashtavakra. So they went alone into the forest and Janaka sat, close to his horse and remained silent with closed eyes, and did not move even when his officers and Ministers came and called him; only when Ashtavakra called him, he moved. So Ashtavakra questioned him: «Many people came, why didn't you reply to their calls?» Raja Janaka answered, «Thoughts, words and deeds are associated with the mind, and I offered my mind entirely to you. Therefore before I can use the mind for anything, I need your permission. What authority do I have to speak to anyone or use this mind in any way without your permission and command?». Then Ashtavakra said: «You have attained the state of God-realization». Being a devoted disciple to become a good master Raja Janaka used to attend the lessons given by the enlightened master Suka. One day the master decided to test his disciples. The disciples were just listening to ‘Atma Bodha’ (the lesson saying that the Atma alone is real and that everything else is appearance, imposed on the Atma, by the fog of illusion and ignorance), when the master managed with his mystic powers so that they could see in the far distance the city of Mithila caught in flames and crumbling in the conflagration. Immediately, all the disciples ran away to save their belongings and warn the other people, while Raja Janaka, unperturbed, remained with his master, even if he had a lot to save as he was just its king. As his master asked him why he did not try to save his city, he replied: «My master and dear friend, the only treasure that I have is you!». In this way, Raja Janaka showed detachment and the true devotion of a disciple, as the only treasure he cared of was the Jnana he was getting from his master. Being Videha - the bodiless One day, a young sage named Narada asked: «Sir, how is it possible that they call you Videha (i.e. beyond physical bonds) if you live in such a luxurious world?». Raja Janaka replied: «It is very simple. I'll tell you tonight. But for now just follow me holding this bowl of milk. Be careful not to spill even a drop of it!». Narada did as he was told and followed the King making sure that the milk did not spill over. At the end of the day he was really exhausted. «Please answer my question now, O Great King. I can’t bear any more following you everywhere and caring of this bowl at the same time!». «First, tell me: what did you see while following me?” Raja Janaka asked to Narada; «Nothing but the bowl» answered Narada «I watched it all the time so that the milk wouldn’t spill!» «What?» replied the king, «There was a ceremony in my honour, then a dance performance and many other beautiful things. Is it possible that you didn't see anything of it?» «No my Lord, I didn’t see anything.» «My boy» said the king finally, «I never see anything either. I spent all my time observing my attention so that it didn’t go to waste, just like your milk». So Narada understood why Raja Janaka was called Videha."

ce tot o dati cu adam si eva, in prezent la new york se legalizeaza casatoriile intre homosexuali. acuma adultii ca adultii, da' cand adopta un copil si copilul acela vine la scoala, ce se intampla? duce de rapa intreaga societate:))

"Materia (structura atomica etc) a fost formata intr-un interval de timp de peste sase mii de miliarde de ani de catre aspectul Creator al lui D-zeu, Brahma-Saraswati, la nivelul chakrei Adi Swadhistan a lui Virata. Galaxiile si sistemul solar au fost materializate in patru mii de miliarde de ani. Apoi Pamintul si-a fixat pozitia intre planete si tipul spatial de miscare, ceea ce a facut posibila aparitia biosferei; in cele din urma a fost generat tesutul celulei vii, asa cum este el revelat de stiintele biologice. Aceste ultime evolutii au avut loc in decursul a 1,1 si respectiv 0,9 mii de miliarde de ani. De la sine inteles, cineva a condus acest proces. Potrivit legilor matematice ale probabilitatilor, timpul necesar pentru aparitia omului pe Pamant ar fi fost suficient abia pentru producerea unei fiinte unicelulare. A fost nevoie de un scamator extrem de priceput, care sa reuseasca trucul" (Shri Mataji - maestru spiritual) so, duhul sfant (energia kundalini) a pregatit spectacolul cosmic:)

da' ce dovada vrei? sa pui mana pe el?)) omul spiritual il cauta. n-ai decat sa-l cauti si tu. ori basta. ne vedem de matze, cum sa dormim, cum sa taiem iarba, who cares?

nu vreau sa zic nimic, trebuie sa experimentezi:)) cum spun mai pe limba ortodoxa: cei iubiti de d-zeu sunt protejati, scapati de rau:)

da' ce comparatie, biserica si violurile:)) care o fi asemanarea, ambele tabere au probleme de inteligenta? ar fi chiar culmea ca religia sa duca la viol:))): bisericosul se presupune a fi smerit cu ego jos, iar agresorul plin de sine:) religiile nu prea conteaza, avand in vedere ca este doar un God. insa e un domeniu nu foarte stiintific, pe care nu prea poti sa-l justifici intelectual. e ca o voce interioara, semnale, vibratii, superstitii, sperante, trebuie sa fi sensibil, sa lasi mintea mai deoparte. sa asisti doar ca un martor.